Between dogma and arbitrariness
A political project can become rigid in two ways: by declaring every early formulation untouchable, or by changing positions so quickly that no common standard remains visible. A version archive offers a third path.
A living doctrine remains recognisable because it does not hide its changes.
What is documented
Principles form the relatively stable normative core. Practice examples and institutional models are explicitly testable. Research questions mark areas without a sufficiently strong answer. Changes record the date, reason and affected content.
Public learning
Transparency alone does not guarantee good development. It does show whether criticism is heard, experience is evaluated and questions of power are taken seriously. The blog serves as the workshop between manifesto, debate and the next version.