What applies today.
Fedlex and Aargau’s official collection define the real baseline. Political proposals are not presented as current law.
Literature and evidence
The sources help test particular assumptions. They do not automatically support the proposal as a whole. Each entry explains how it is used.
01 · Reading rule
Fedlex and Aargau’s official collection define the real baseline. Political proposals are not presented as current law.
Comparative work provides mechanisms, risks and criteria, but no automatic political endorsement.
Fundamental and human rights constrain every local majority, transition strategy and emergency power.
The dossiers remain political discussion drafts. Sources support partial assumptions; they do not prove a complete ideology.
02 · Bibliography
Legal baseline for fundamental rights, political rights, the rule of law, subsidiarity and municipal autonomy. It describes the present starting point, not the Deluist target model.
Open original sourceExisting Swiss legal form for collective self-help. It provides an immediately usable transition path but does not by itself amount to wider economic democracy.
Open original sourceCantonal baseline for fundamental rights, popular rights, municipalities and public responsibilities.
Open original sourceGoverns present municipal bodies, competences, supervision and finance. The roadmap distinguishes measures possible within this framework from reforms requiring legal change.
Open original sourceProcedures for cantonal and municipal elections, votes and municipal assemblies.
Open original sourceInternational reference for voluntary membership, democratic member control, autonomy, education and cooperation among cooperatives.
Open original sourceInternationally agreed framework for supportive cooperative policy without state capture or legal discrimination.
Open original sourceEmpirical and institutional reference for polycentric governance and self-governed commons. It also cautions against universal one-size-fits-all solutions.
Open original sourceMinimum standards and evaluation criteria for representative deliberation: purpose, representation, learning, independence, impact and public evaluation.
Open original sourceComparative practice source on the opportunities, limits and procedural questions of participatory budgeting.
Open original sourceNon-negotiable human-rights framework for political participation, expression, assembly, association and equal protection of the law.
Open original sourceHuman-rights reference for work, social security, health, education and participation in cultural life.
Open original sourceLocal primary source for Aarau’s CHF 50,000 participatory-budget pilot. It grounds the model calculation but does not endorse its proposed scale.
Open original sourceOfficial reference for the city’s budgeted turnover. The practice calculation uses it only as a denominator and claims no political endorsement.
Open original sourceLegal framework for transformations and asset transfers. Relevant to an employee buyout, but no substitute for case-specific tax and legal review.
Open original sourcePractical baseline for valuation, financing and process risks in business succession. It does not advocate Deluist ownership policy.
Open original sourceA classic challenge to the assumption that informal groups become egalitarian without formal structures. It supports transparent mandates and accountability over romanticised structurelessness.
Open original sourceA strong challenge to central planning: relevant knowledge is distributed, local and often tacit. Deluism must show that federation handles this problem rather than merely renaming it.
Open original sourceConceptual reference for the essay on freedom and material security; especially pp. 218–219.
Open original sourceHuman-rights reference for the essay on emergency powers, especially paragraphs 1–5. The proposed allocation of powers is the essay's own.
Open original source03 · Claim evidence
Legal basis: Code of Obligations, Articles 828–926. Democratic quality: ICA and ILO R193.
Legal and human-rights baseline: Federal Constitution, Aargau Constitution and ICCPR.
Comparative frame: OECD guidelines and World Bank practice on participatory budgeting.
Ostrom’s research supports neither state centralism nor market monism and warns against one universal institution.
04 · Criticism that changes the draft
Objection: Informal networks can govern less transparently than formal bodies.
Consequence: Every working group needs a public mandate, rotation, minutes and recallable responsibility. “Flat” is not evidence of quality.
Read FreemanObjection: Prices and local experience contain distributed knowledge a planning council cannot completely collect.
Consequence: Provision goals must remain narrow; local units choose means, report shortages and may justify deviations. Whether this is enough remains open.
Read HayekObjection: A CHF 50,000 participatory budget says little about billion-franc budgets, crises or distributional conflict.
Consequence: A local example cannot establish a general theory. Claims about an entire economic order require further evidence about coordination and its response to conflict.
Examine the Aarau pilot05 · Challenge
A reference shows where an argument comes from; it does not settle the argument. Compare the proposed institutions with the objections and the limits identified for each source.