DELUISMA political inquiry
DE
← All positions

Position paper 01 · deep dossier

Economy & ownership

From private power of disposal to democratic responsibility.

Premise

Where this draft begins.

Production should meet needs, enable good work and respect ecological limits. Ownership grants no unrestricted authority over other people.

Political direction

What should concretely change.

  1. 01

    Prioritise cooperative and municipal forms of ownership.

  2. 02

    Gradually transform large enterprises into democratically governed guilds.

  3. 03

    Coordinate investment according to social need and resource impact.

  4. 04

    Measure success through provision, time prosperity and ecological regeneration.

Safeguards

What must not be lost.

Personal possessions and private life remain protected.

Workplace democracy needs minority rights and independent conflict procedures.

Transitions must not endanger provision or individual livelihoods.

Open research

Not yet answered.

How can prices and scarcity signals be translated across complex supply chains?
Which transition models work for small, medium-sized and global enterprises?
Dossier 1.2 · discussion draft18–22 min.

The institutional proposal.

How can economic power be democratised without destroying provision, innovation, individual choice or investment capacity?

01 · Institutional model

01

Three spheres of ownership

Personal possessions remain private. Small and medium-sized enterprises may be private, cooperative or municipal. Systemically important networks and dominant corporations face graduated public or membership control.

The decisive question is who can decide over investment, surplus, work and closure.
02

Democratic guilds

Workers elect councils, adopt statutes and control strategic decisions. User and public-interest chambers gain a voice where effects extend far beyond the enterprise.

A two-chamber structure prevents both capital domination and an exclusively producer-centred view.
03

Plural investment funds

Regional funds combine public capital, cooperative shares, pension capital and a share of large corporate surpluses. Independent review separates feasibility from political priority.

Investments are published, time-limited and reviewed against provision and climate goals.
04

Coordinated markets

Prices remain information signals for many goods. Basic provision, natural monopolies and hard ecological limits are not left to purchasing power alone.

Democratic planning sets limits and guarantees; decentralised enterprises decide within that corridor.

02 · Transition path

Steps towards implementation.

01 · Start now

Municipal procurement favours democratic, climate-compatible and transparent enterprises; advisory funds support cooperative succession.

Level
Municipality / canton
Evidence
Qualified procurement and secured jobs
Reversal
Evaluate criteria annually; suspend ineffective rules.
02 · Broaden co-determination

Establish works councils, profit transparency and worker rights of first refusal upon sale or closure.

Level
Federation
Evidence
Co-determination coverage and democratic buyouts
Reversal
Revise thresholds after independent evaluation.
03 · Redirect capital

Regional transformation funds finance decarbonisation, care infrastructure and worker buyouts.

Level
Canton / federation
Evidence
Provision, emissions, default rate and concentration
Reversal
Individual mandates expire; losses are accounted for publicly.
04 · Limit systemic power

Natural monopolies and dominant networks face democratic ownership and governance duties.

Level
Federation / agreements
Evidence
Prices, access, resilience and democratic control
Reversal
Periodic popular and judicial review.

03 · Financing

How it could be funded.

  • Redirect existing business support towards transformation goals.
  • Use repayable public stakes rather than permanent blanket subsidies.
  • Capture excess monopoly rents and unreinvested large surpluses.
  • Combine cooperative shares, pension windows and municipal bonds with clear risk labelling.

04 · Public measures

How to judge the results.

  • Median pay and pay ratios
  • Working time and involuntary overtime
  • Reliability of provision
  • Emissions and material use
  • Co-determination coverage
  • Market and decision concentration

05 · Conflict cases

The model under pressure.

A democratic enterprise remains inefficient.

Proposed response: Open indicators, a restructuring mandate and temporary expertise; members then decide on restructuring, merger or closure.

Still unresolved: How can politically sustained losses be prevented from becoming permanent?

Workers externalise environmental costs.

Proposed response: Ecological budgets and affected persons’ rights are not subject to an internal vote; the public-interest chamber may challenge decisions.

Still unresolved: Which sanctions work without jeopardising provision?

Innovation requires very high-risk capital.

Proposed response: Competing funds, milestone finance and limited success participation allow risk without permanent private domination.

Still unresolved: How much unequal reward is compatible with equal power?

06 · Strong objections

Democracy slows every business decision.

The model separates operational responsibility from strategic constitutional decisions. Speed is measured but not treated as the only value.

Political funds become prey to parties and interest groups.

Multiple funds, published criteria, oversight by lot, conflict rules and judicial challenge limit capture.

07 · Sources

References for this dossier.

Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft · FedlexObligationenrecht · Art. 828–926 GenossenschaftExisting Swiss legal form for collective self-help. It provides an immediately usable transition path but does not by itself amount to wider economic democracy.International Cooperative AllianceStatement on the Cooperative IdentityInternational reference for voluntary membership, democratic member control, autonomy, education and cooperation among cooperatives.International Labour OrganizationPromotion of Cooperatives Recommendation, No. 193Internationally agreed framework for supportive cooperative policy without state capture or legal discrimination.Elinor Ostrom · Nobel Prize LectureBeyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic SystemsEmpirical and institutional reference for polycentric governance and self-governed commons. It also cautions against universal one-size-fits-all solutions.United Nations · OHCHRInternational Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural RightsHuman-rights reference for work, social security, health, education and participation in cultural life.